This is the narrative being driven by using residence lawmakers led via rep. Dave greenspan. Eklund admits that it has performed a part in s 111 not having any momentum within the first 1/2 of the ohio legislative consultation. It hasn’t even been assigned to a committee. Eklund said: “i think part of the cause it's been slow to transport at the senate aspect has been because of some lingering and, for my part, unjustified issues over the quantity of which the ohio constitution could allow the casino commission to modify this activity. “i have argued that point publicly, privately and 6 ways to sunday. I’m not simply speakme thru my hat. I’ve researched it, read instances, and that i really realize sufficient about the constitution of ohio.” the argument against the ccc overseeing oh sports activities betting revolves across the antique argument approximately whether wagering on sports is a casino recreation. Greenspan has an opinion from the legislative provider fee that shows, beneath the ohio constitution, it isn't always. “nothing within the ohio charter says the casino control commission might not regulate sports activities gaming,” eklund stated. “nothing. In the event that they need to take that tact, which i suppose is wrongheaded, i ought to make the similarly wrongheaded argument that the charter doesn’t authorize the lottery commission to regulate sports gaming. Numerous this is making an attempt to interpret words to get a particular end result.”